• Home
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Real Estate
    • Q&A
    • Business Profiles
    • Networking
    • Public Record
    • Opinion
      • Our View
  • Real Estate & Construction
    • Latest News
    • Top Properties
    • Building Permits
    • Building Tri-Cities
  • Special Publications
    • Book of Lists
    • Best Places to Work
    • People of Influence
    • Young Professionals
    • Hanford
    • Energy
    • Focus: Agriculture + Viticulture
    • Focus: Construction + Real Estate
  • E-Edition
  • Calendar
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Journal Events
    • Senior Times Expo
    • Young Professionals
      • Sponsor Young Professionals
    • Best Places to Work
      • Sponsor BPTW
    • People of Influence
      • Sponsor People of Influence
    • Tri-Cities Workforce Forum
      • Sponsor TC Workforce Forum
  • Senior Times
    • About Senior Times
    • Read Senior Times Stories
    • Senior Times Expo
    • Obituaries and Death Notices
Home » Comcast lawsuit argues new Washington tax on advertising is illegal

Comcast lawsuit argues new Washington tax on advertising is illegal

The tax is set to take effect Oct. 1. If the company gets it overturned, it could cost the state nearly a half-billion dollars in revenue over the next four years.

September 15, 2025
Jerry Cornfield

Comcast is suing to block a new Washington law imposing sales tax on advertising services, imperiling a financial linchpin lawmakers relied on to balance the state’s budget.

The cable giant contends that the statute set to take effect Oct. 1 violates federal law because it does not apply the tax to all advertising services in the same manner.

Attorneys for the corporation also assert that parts of the law are not allowed under the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act, which bars states from imposing “discriminatory taxes” on electronic commerce. 

“Almost all forms of advertising conducted over the Internet are subject to the tax, while most forms of advertising conducted off the Internet are not subject to the tax,” they wrote.

If Comcast succeeds in getting the tax overturned, it could force major recalibrations in the budget.

Striking the tax on advertising services alone would reduce tax collections by roughly $475 million over the next four fiscal years, said Mikhail Carpenter, a spokesperson for the state’s Department of Revenue.

The lawsuit filed in Thurston County Superior Court on Sept. 9 names the state and the Department of Revenue as main defendants. 

A Comcast spokesman said the lawsuit lays out the company’s concerns and declined to comment further.

Department of Revenue officials are reviewing it with legal counsel, Carpenter said.

The fight centers on a section of Senate Bill 5814, a major expansion of business taxes passed by the Democratic majorities in the House and Senate in April and signed by Democratic Gov. Bob Ferguson in May. Republicans in both chambers opposed the bill.

This bill is counted on to raise roughly $1.1 billion in this two-year budget and $2.7 billion over four years, much of it by charging the retail sales and use tax on more services, such as digital advertising, security services and temporary staffing.

It is one of the largest pieces of a $9.4 billion package that Democrats approved in April to balance the current budget, and the next one as well.

Comcast is contesting provisions that will require sales tax be collected for ads sold by streaming services, while exempting advertising services of newspapers, radio and television broadcasting, as well as on billboards and buses. Naming rights and ads in stadiums will not be subject to the tax either.

This would mean, for example, a Seattle television station won’t charge sales tax on ads sold to a local business, but a streaming service like Netflix must charge sales tax if it sells an ad to the same business.

“These excluded categories of advertising were drawn in such a way that the burden of the tax falls on Internet-based advertising, rather than non-Internet based advertising,” reads the lawsuit.

The lawsuit is not raising a new issue.

A coalition of streaming services, including Netflix, Paramount+, Peacock, and the Walt Disney Co., urged Ferguson to veto the bill, arguing the new advertising tax would lead to higher costs for customers or fewer options if services leave the market.

“Singling out one segment of the ad economy for this kind of discriminatory treatment is the wrong way to address the state’s fiscal needs and would do far more harm than good,” the Streaming Innovation Alliance told the governor in a letter.

The Department of Revenue is in the process of writing final rules for implementation of the tax law. 

As part of the process, in July, it held two “listening sessions” in which business owners and operators sought clarity on what advertising services would be covered, questioned the legality of the approach, and expressed concern consumers would be negatively impacted.

The department expects to issue “interim guidance” on advertising service in the next two weeks, Carpenter said. It will provide taxpayers with instructions “they can rely on while the department continues to review issues and adopts final interpretive guidance.”

This guidance will not address the legal issues raised by the lawsuit, he said. 

This story is republished from the Washington State Standard, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news outlet that provides original reporting, analysis and commentary on Washington state government and politics. 

    Latest News Local News Legal
    KEYWORDS September 2025
    • Related Articles

      State alerts thousands of businesses ahead of new retail sales tax changes

      Survey: WA employers uneasy amid tax and tariff challenges

      Rushed sales tax law will raise costs for all Washingtonians

    Cornfield profile photo scaled e1683092256616 300x300
    Jerry Cornfield

    Large-scale solar farm in central WA gets green light from governor

    More from this author
    Free Email Updates

    Daily and Monthly News

    Sign up now!

    Featured Poll

    What is your biggest business concern heading into 2026?

    Popular Articles

    • Javis chicken  churros 2
      By TCAJOB Staff

      Recent newcomer to Tri-City restaurant scene moving out

    • Solgen1
      By Ty Beaver

      Solgen to lay off employees, close WA operations in 2026

    • July bouten
      By TCAJOB Staff

      Latest Providence layoffs hit Richland, Walla Walla hospitals

    • Complete suite
      By TCAJOB Staff

      Richland furniture gallery closing down

    • Moses lake groff
      By Ty Beaver

      Tri-City builder, architect face lawsuit in school construction project

    • News Content
      • Latest news
      • Real Estate & Construction
      • Public records
      • Special publications
      • Senior Times
    • Customer Service
      • Our Readers
      • Subscriptions
      • Advertise
      • Editorial calendar
      • Media Kit
    • Connect With Us
      • Submit news
      • Submit an event
      • E-newsletters
      • E-Edition
      • Contact
    • Learn More
      • About Us
      • Our Events
      • FAQs
      • Privacy Policy
      • Spokane Journal of Business

    Mailing Address: 8656 W. Gage Blvd., Ste. C303  Kennewick, WA 99336 USA

    MCM_Horiz.png

    All content copyright © 2025 Mid-Columbia Media Inc. All rights reserved.
    No reproduction, transmission or display is permitted without the written permissions of Mid-Columbia Media Inc.

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing