• Home
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Real Estate
    • Q&A
    • Business Profiles
    • Networking
    • Public Record
    • Opinion
      • Our View
  • Real Estate & Construction
    • Latest News
    • Top Properties
    • Building Permits
    • Building Tri-Cities
  • Special Publications
    • Book of Lists
    • Best Places to Work
    • People of Influence
    • Young Professionals
    • Hanford
    • Energy
    • Focus: Agriculture + Viticulture
    • Focus: Construction + Real Estate
  • E-Edition
  • Calendar
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Journal Events
    • Senior Times Expo
    • Young Professionals
      • Sponsor Young Professionals
    • Best Places to Work
      • Sponsor BPTW
    • People of Influence
      • Sponsor People of Influence
    • Tri-Cities Workforce Forum
      • Sponsor TC Workforce Forum
  • Senior Times
    • About Senior Times
    • Read Senior Times Stories
    • Senior Times Expo
    • Obituaries and Death Notices
Home » Our state benefits from Alaska oil leasing

Our state benefits from Alaska oil leasing

DonBrunell.jpg
May 16, 2024
Guest Contributor

President Biden recently launched the second phase of his attack on domestic oil and gas production by effectively blocking leases in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve, or ANPR.

That follows last year’s reimposed ban on exploration in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, or ANWR. Both actions are ill advised.

In the Wall Street Journal, Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan, a Republican, quipped: “The Biden Administration has imposed more sanctions on Alaska than it has on Iran.”

The Interior Department recently blocked new oil and gas leasing on 13.3 million acres in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve. Congress expressly set aside the region in 1923 for oil and gas development, but Biden ignores this, saying drilling would disturb the Arctic’s “natural wonders,” Sullivan said.

Energy development and environmental protection are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they are compatible and concurrent.

On Alaska’s North Slope — the northern area of the state on the northern slope of the Brooks Range — exploration and construction take place during the winter, over roads built on sheets of ice. When the ice melts, the roads disappear. Drilling and production have strong and long-standing environmental safeguards.

ANWR is not a place with towering snow-capped peaks and lush green forests. It is 19 million acres of frozen desert larger than the states of Massachusetts, New Jersey, Hawaii, Connecticut and Delaware combined.  

Although the 1.5 million acres in ARWR, called the coastal plain, were set aside for future leasing in 1980, drilling would occur on less than 2,000 acres. That is like a small dot on an 8-by-10 inch sheet of paper.

“The U.S. Geological Survey estimates this sliver of land contains at least 10.4 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 8.6 trillion of natural gas, and those estimates are probably conservative,” the Wall Street Journal editorialized last year. By comparison, Alaska’s second-biggest oil field, Kuparuk, holds about 2.5 billion barrels.

In fairness to Biden, in 2023 he greenlighted leases in the Willow area, a 500-acre site inside ANPR. When in production, it is estimated to produce 180,000 barrels of oil daily, an amount equivalent to 27% of Washington’s refinery requirements.

“All of this punishment for Alaska comes as the Administration eases sanctions on Venezuelan oil production and fails to enforce oil sanctions on Iran. Meantime, the Russians, and Chinese are increasing investment in Arctic oil, gas and mineral development,” Sullivan noted in the Journal story.

Allowing new oil and gas leases would help our country long term, particularly Washington refineries, workers and state and local economies. Current crude supplies from Alaska’s North Slope are declining and refiners have looked elsewhere for replacement stocks, i.e., oil by rail from North Dakota and tanker shipments from foreign countries, many of whom are hostile to America.

Washington’s five refineries provide 4% of our nation’s processing capacity. With our state accounting for 2% of national petroleum consumption, in-state refineries produce quantities more than sufficient for Washington’s needs. Those refineries processed crude oil into 13 million gallons of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and finished products each day.

Alaska crude comes to our refineries in double-hulled ocean-going tankers. Since the Exxon Valdez incident in Prince William Sound in March 1989, state-of-the art redundant marine safeguards are aboard ships. Tanker crews have extensive safety and response training.

The crude, which is 12,000 feet below ground, would be extracted by a widely used technique known as horizontal drilling. Production wells would be spaced a dozen feet apart yet would reach out for miles in different directions underground. The oil would then be piped to Prudhoe Bay and sent 800 miles south via the existing Trans Alaska Pipeline.

“With a multiplier of 12%, the total impact of our refineries was 25,000 jobs and $2 billion in personal income,” according to The Washington Research Council.

That is good for our state and country.

Don C. Brunell is a business analyst, writer, and columnist. He retired as president of the Association of Washington Business, the state’s oldest and largest business organization. During his 28-year AWB tenure, he made many trips to Alaska’s oil and gas production sites on the North Slope and saw the vast operations firsthand. He can be contacted at [email protected].

    Opinion
    KEYWORDS May 2024
    • Related Articles

      EV battery recycling will require Herculean effort

      America still needs more welders, fewer philosophers

      More worn-out wind blades, solar panels are landing in dumps

    Guest contributor 1 300x300
    Guest Contributor

    4 ways to model calm, confidence and clarity

    More from this author
    Free Email Updates

    Daily and Monthly News

    Sign up now!

    Featured Poll

    What is your biggest business concern heading into 2026?

    Popular Articles

    • Javis chicken  churros 2
      By TCAJOB Staff

      Recent newcomer to Tri-City restaurant scene moving out

    • Solgen1
      By Ty Beaver

      Solgen to lay off employees, close WA operations in 2026

    • July bouten
      By TCAJOB Staff

      Latest Providence layoffs hit Richland, Walla Walla hospitals

    • Complete suite
      By TCAJOB Staff

      Richland furniture gallery closing down

    • Moses lake groff
      By Ty Beaver

      Tri-City builder, architect face lawsuit in school construction project

    • News Content
      • Latest news
      • Real Estate & Construction
      • Public records
      • Special publications
      • Senior Times
    • Customer Service
      • Our Readers
      • Subscriptions
      • Advertise
      • Editorial calendar
      • Media Kit
    • Connect With Us
      • Submit news
      • Submit an event
      • E-newsletters
      • E-Edition
      • Contact
    • Learn More
      • About Us
      • Our Events
      • FAQs
      • Privacy Policy
      • Spokane Journal of Business

    Mailing Address: 8656 W. Gage Blvd., Ste. C303  Kennewick, WA 99336 USA

    MCM_Horiz.png

    All content copyright © 2025 Mid-Columbia Media Inc. All rights reserved.
    No reproduction, transmission or display is permitted without the written permissions of Mid-Columbia Media Inc.

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing