• Home
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Real Estate
    • Q&A
    • Business Profiles
    • Networking
    • Public Record
    • Opinion
      • Our View
  • Real Estate & Construction
    • Latest News
    • Top Properties
    • Building Permits
    • Building Tri-Cities
  • Special Publications
    • Book of Lists
    • Best Places to Work
    • People of Influence
    • Young Professionals
    • Hanford
    • Energy
    • Focus: Agriculture + Viticulture
    • Focus: Construction + Real Estate
  • E-Edition
  • Calendar
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Journal Events
    • Senior Times Expo
    • Young Professionals
      • Sponsor Young Professionals
    • Best Places to Work
      • Sponsor BPTW
    • People of Influence
      • Sponsor People of Influence
    • Tri-Cities Workforce Forum
      • Sponsor TC Workforce Forum
  • Senior Times
    • About Senior Times
    • Read Senior Times Stories
    • Senior Times Expo
    • Obituaries and Death Notices
Home » Put it in writing: The insufficiency of the handshake deal

Put it in writing: The insufficiency of the handshake deal

June 12, 2020
Guest Contributor

Have you ever yearned for the good old days where a handshake deal was all you needed? The days where, with that handshake, you could trust that the deal would get done and get done right?

Those days of trust are not gone. People are still generally trustworthy. People want to fulfill their obligations.

But, those who think the good old days — where handshake deals ruled — are how things should be are perhaps romanticizing the past. A handshake deal is rarely sufficient.

It simply does not provide an opportunity to lay out and formalize all expectations. And, it’s not the lawyers who have muddied the world of contracts. Lawyers are not the people that have caused the problem.

Rather, lawyers have reacted to the problems that occur when a contract is absent. They see what happens when handshake deals go bad — even between two good, trustworthy people.

I like to think, maybe optimistically, that most contract disputes are not the result of shady actors and fraudulent intentions.

Instead, disputes often arise because of a misunderstanding between the parties. Of course, there are the occasional bad actors working intentionally to defraud others. But, those are the small minority.

More often, two parties are trying to faithfully come to an agreement and perform their individual duties.

However, we not only have faulty memories, we also have our own viewpoint, our own expectations, our own concepts of “right,” and our own pride in our ability to convey information and expectations (though we are also often critical of others’ ability to convey information).

Let’s look at a “simple” example.

Assume both parties are as honest as the day is long. You hire someone to install a fence for your backyard. You tell the contractor you want a 6-foot cedar fence for $2,000. Handshake.

Should that really be enough? The “what ifs” are virtually limitless.

What if the contractor drops off the wood at the house and it is stolen that night? Who is responsible?

What if the owner misunderstood the property line and discovered the problem after installation started? What if the contractor installed western red cedar and you really wanted northern white cedar?

When is payment due? What if there is a delay in payment? What if halfway through the job (or after the job) wind blows over the fence? Does it matter what speed the wind was blowing?  What is the threshold that would shift liability from the owner to the contractor?

What if the contractor makes the fence dog-eared when the owner thought it would be a straight-top?

A contract is certainly helpful in enforcing a person’s right.

More importantly, it is vital in setting out the expectations for many variables while also covering the unexpected. And, one can imagine if the contractor (in this hypothetical scenario, the most honest person on the planet) had different verbal agreements on all these matters with 10 different (or 100 different) customers, it would be really hard to keep track of all the terms if they were not in writing.

Doesn’t it make sense then to capture all the terms in a written document that each party signs to ensure they both understood and agreed to all the terms?

In many circumstances, a handshake deal would have been enough. The job gets done to your reasonable satisfaction. No contract needed. No lawyer needed.

In many cases, the unexpected never happens and the information conveyed between the parties is clear enough to get the job done to the satisfaction of both parties. But, in a surprising number of cases, something comes up.

And, necessarily, that short handshake deal didn’t anticipate all the possible somethings that commonly come up. It is likely that no written contract will cover every conceivable eventuality, but wouldn’t it be better to have a written agreement that covered the most common issues that are likely to pop up rather than relying on the handshake?

Beau Ruff, a licensed attorney, is the director of planning at Cornerstone Wealth Strategies, a full-service independent investment management and financial planning firm in Kennewick.

    Local News
    KEYWORDS june 2020
    Guest contributor 1 300x300
    Guest Contributor

    4 ways to model calm, confidence and clarity

    More from this author
    Free Email Updates

    Daily and Monthly News

    Sign up now!

    Featured Poll

    What is your biggest business concern heading into 2026?

    Popular Articles

    • Javis chicken  churros 2
      By TCAJOB Staff

      Recent newcomer to Tri-City restaurant scene moving out

    • Solgen1
      By Ty Beaver

      Solgen to lay off employees, close WA operations in 2026

    • July bouten
      By TCAJOB Staff

      Latest Providence layoffs hit Richland, Walla Walla hospitals

    • Complete suite
      By TCAJOB Staff

      Richland furniture gallery closing down

    • Moses lake groff
      By Ty Beaver

      Tri-City builder, architect face lawsuit in school construction project

    • News Content
      • Latest news
      • Real Estate & Construction
      • Public records
      • Special publications
      • Senior Times
    • Customer Service
      • Our Readers
      • Subscriptions
      • Advertise
      • Editorial calendar
      • Media Kit
    • Connect With Us
      • Submit news
      • Submit an event
      • E-newsletters
      • E-Edition
      • Contact
    • Learn More
      • About Us
      • Our Events
      • FAQs
      • Privacy Policy
      • Spokane Journal of Business

    Mailing Address: 8656 W. Gage Blvd., Ste. C303  Kennewick, WA 99336 USA

    MCM_Horiz.png

    All content copyright © 2025 Mid-Columbia Media Inc. All rights reserved.
    No reproduction, transmission or display is permitted without the written permissions of Mid-Columbia Media Inc.

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing